How to create the perfect bioenergy plant

I’ve been a little quiet on the blog lately, and maybe one of the reasons was a manuscript that I’ve been working on and would like to highlight here.  Since one of my co-authors on the paper is fellow blogger John Field, he will post some perspective from his side of things on the same paper a bit later.

We decided to review the existing knowledge about how to optimize plant biomass for thermochemical bioenergy (basically this means burning the biomass).  Since my research is trying to understand how plant genetics can be used to create better bioenergy feedstocks, I’ve thought and written about this before.  However, when I talk to alot of the engineers and people thinking of the processing aspect, they don’t seem to think there are major differences in different plants – they generally think of biomass as “woody” or not woody.

We know from a long and successful history of domestication of various plants, we can drastically change the genetics and thus everything about the plant.  Just look at the ancestors of modern wheat, corn, or any other food crop.  It seemed like there have been lots of papers on the technical aspects of thermochemical conversion, but not many had asked this question: If we wanted to breed (or create with biotechnology) the perfect plant for thermochemical energy … what traits would we target, and how would we measure them?  We tend to focus on traits that we know some of the genes that control them, such as the enzymes that make cellulose, but what genes control more abstract traits like “grindability”?  Is grindability something that we can explain by the amounts of cellulose and lignin (or alternatively, C, H, and O?)?  Is this something we can easily measure – if we can’t measure it easily (and cheaply), we can’t study it.

As we said in the conclusion: “The most biologically interesting traits may not be the traits that will have the greatest economic and lifecycle impact.”  In fact, what we find is that the best approach might be to ignore all the cell wall analysis that people work on for enzymatic bioenergy, and just measure the carbon, hydrogen, and oxygen in the biomass, and calculate energy yields and other components from these numbers.

Of course our first submission was not accepted, but they invited us to resubmit so we got to work on reorganizing and trying to make clear what we wanted to say.  In the end I think we put together a really nice figure of how certain plant properties relate to eachother, and to bioenergy:inter-relationships of feedstock traits

Check out the paper for more:

Paul Tanger, John L. Field, Courtney E. Jahn, Morgan W. DeFoort, & Jan E. Leach (2013). Biomass for thermochemical conversion: targets and challenges Frontiers in Plant Science, 4 (218) DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2013.00218

Advertisements
This entry was posted in biofuels, energy, science and tagged , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

One Response to How to create the perfect bioenergy plant

  1. Pingback: John’s thoughts on Tanger et al. 2013 | Energy and the Future

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s