-
Recent Posts
- Could sugar dumping push ethanol production up?
- Update to ‘IPCC systematically low-balling climate estimates?’
- Quality control in Excel spreadsheets- a serious and universal issue!
- The “future” of clean coal – is not in our future
- IMF report on energy subsidies, implications for a carbon tax & energy security
Share our stuff!

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.Archives
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
Categories
Tags
air pollution battery technology biomass combustion CAFE carbon tax CCS CDM cellulosic clean coal coal communication congress CSU development economics efficiency electric energy costs energy use EPA ERS ethanol feedstocks food fracking funding gas genetics geoengineering GHG ILUC investment LCA media modeling NSF politics public opinion Q & A R&D RFS statistics subsidies thermochemical waterContributors
Blogroll
Meta
Monthly Archives: October 2011
DDGS substitute for more corn grain than previously thought
This could be a big deal! DDGS from ethanol production can substitute for more corn grain for animal feed than previously thought (and calculated) : http://southeastfarmpress.com/livestock/feed-value-ethanol-products-long-underestimated?page=1 via University of Illinois Center for Advanced BioEnergy Research
Step One… California approves carbon trading program
Posted in biofuels, climate change, policy
Leave a comment
For biofuel crops, like any other crop, genetics matter!
Today I want to mention a couple recent developments on the bioenergy feedstock front. Specifically, these deal with engineering the genetics of a bioenergy crop with enhanced characteristics for bioenergy. First up, is switchgrass with a gene that prevents flowering … Continue reading
More on external costs of energy
Continuing my collection of recent estimates of external costs of energy, I found this National Academies report (free to download as pdf). As mostly a biologist, I found this discussion of the absurdity of the US trying to limit “foreign oil” … Continue reading
DOE changes focus
On Sept 27, 2011 the Department of Energy (DOE) published a “Report on the First Quadrennial Technology Review.” The report suggests more research will be funded in areas of energy efficient transportation and electrical use and less in areas related … Continue reading
Posted in Uncategorized
Leave a comment
New paper estimates costs of air pollution from US industry
Just saw this paper (citation below) with fresh estimates of costs of air pollution based on real data across the entire US, divided by sectors of the economy. Not unsurprisingly, coal generated electricity comes out as the worst – accounting for … Continue reading
The geothermal version of fracking?
Check it out: http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-10-06/california-s-underground-hot-rocks-probed-for-energy-of-100-nuclear-plants.html Not only could I see issues with bringing possibly radioactive water back to the surface, but here are some other issues they mention in the article: Blowouts and Earthquakes While a handful of small EGS plants … Continue reading
NRC gives RFS little hope for 2022 deadlines
Certain Biofuel Mandates Unlikely to Be Met by 2022 Unless New Technologies, Policies Developed The National Research Council expects the RFS to miss 2022 targets for advanced and cellulosic biofuels unless researchers and government develop better technologies and policies in … Continue reading
Statistical pitfalls- significant differences
From The Guardian: The statistical error that just keeps on coming Obvious when you think about it, but apparently it’s an easy mistake to make- beware!